August 8 - Urbanism/Cosmopolitanism/Japonism
That the sushi
place down the street is Halal certified is telling – whether of our
neighborhood, of Paris, of France itself, I’m not sure; but it’s certainly its
own kind of wonderful and it helped us make our final point about Japonisme at
the end of our Impressionism/ Urbanism explorations. We spent most of our time at the Musée
d’Orsay in front of the two paintings of the Japanese bridge in Monet’s garden.
Inexplicably (and I should dig harder to find out the story), the swimming pool
in our town in Indiana has a tori at the front door, and the “clean line” look
of it made sense to the kids in relation to that smooth arc of Monet’s bridge.
Mac said that Monet himself had it built, and then we mused on why: the opening
of Japan to the West, as the phrase goes; the market created for all things
Japanese; the fascination the Impressionists had with the flatness of Japanese
woodblock prints (perspective must die! art is in what is directly seen!
flatness is the aesthetic of the immediate!); the aesthetic of a pristine
exotic and all its accompanying assumptions about how European culture might be
rejuvenated through its appropriations of other cultures (one way of putting
colonialism). That’s a lot for two long arcs of paint – but Mac pointed out the
Japanese irises in the next painting, and it all started to connect (the
fabrics, the fans, the flowers, this vision). Both Oliver and Iris chose
Giverny paintings to discuss; Eleanor chose a winter, urban Caillebotte scene
(snow on rooftops, steely grey everything) – she liked the thick paint; and so
Mac scared all of us by talking about how hard white is to make and how they
added lead to it in the 19th century. Art fright!
link to the exhibition |
One of my sabbatical projects
is to work on a politics of the museum course (to be titled “Politics of the
Museum: history, ethnicity, nation” or “History of the Museum: politics,
ethnicity, nation” – haven’t decided how far back I’m going to go: “politics”
would focus more on contemporary displays; “history” would have us thinking
through the Wunderkammers). I had thought about studying the Quai Branly museum
very closely and seeking out its various theses, but boy, has it ever reached
out instead. All over Paris are ads for its big show “Tiki Pop” about how those
crazy Americans appropriated Polynesian culture into their drinking culture,
fashion, and goodness knows what else. What I can’t tell from the posters (and
this is telling) is whether or not
there’s a critique there or just this weird reveling. I remember being stunned
a few years ago as I slowly realized that a show devoted to Victor Hugo’s Les Orientales was actually quite nostalgic about French colonialism and
its exotic mysteries, perpetuating both. You don’t. need. a. hookah. for a show
about Victor Hugo’s poetry. But there it was, with a little rug and stool. And
many paintings of sleepy unclad women and young boys from Tunisia and Algeria.
One of the points of the course will be to develop a critical stance about the
twist that post-colonialism has taken towards a neo-colonialism (basically,
other means of exploitation than direct colonialism). And also to study those
earlier moments of appropriation (do I go to the Crusades? to the Roman
empire?). Today made me think a great deal about the exportation of the natural
world, of flowers and trees transplanted, giraffes in exile in Paris zoos. And
about the tipping points/the intersecting lines of colonialism, appropriation,
cosmopolitanism, and an urban internationalism that pushes at Europe itself. At
some point, sushi came to Courbevoie, and at another, it was Halal certified.
In the meantime, I keep going back to what Iris said as we pulled away from the
Japanese bridge paintings: “There’s this idea that nature is calm, because it’s
not rushed like the city; but actually it’s full of stuff happening – like
Japan in France.”
August 9 - Surfaces
To write a love letter to
Jacques Tati is to write a love letter to Paris, and there are plenty
(beautiful examples) of those already around. Seeing the digitally re-mastered
version of Playtime in Paris itself,
though, makes me want to, yes, play with at least one of his big ideas from the
film. Surfaces: transparencies and reflections abound in the movie, constantly
pivoting virtual and real communication – the kids were a little dizzied by it,
loving the movie almost as a ride; Mac noticed a new connection (the winner of
the boxing match on the television everyone’s watching at night is announced on
a newspaper front page the next morning); and I let myself get a little dizzy
thinking about the surface moves from celluloid to digital. That’s the
tenderness of the film for me: its caress of surfaces – sleek, modern ones
(gleaming, smooth, and long); rough, traditional ones (textured, disruptive,
and unpredictable); even aural ones: insistent electronics, precise human
footsteps, muffled human voices, hip jazz and traditional Parisian street song.
Old Paris (old humanity?) is directly beneath the surface of New Paris (we
moderns), just waiting to bubble up and make everything human again. We noticed
this time that the gesture that brings the whole modern restaurant crashing
down around itself is Monsieur Hulot reaching up into the decorations for an
apple (!) that a lady desired (!!). I could over-interpret everything and talk
about how human desires will bring any pristine Eden down, but I wouldn’t want
to do that. Living near La Défense (18th-century military garrison
(thus the name) turned, as of the 1970s, into a constant experiment (with mixed
results) of the city of the future) proves instructive here. Daily, we move
from our brick houses and café neighborhood to the unrelenting expanses of
steel and glass and back into an entire city that insists upon the human scale.
Paris has sequestered its modernist architecture to an emblem on its fringe. In
the center (and everywhere else) modern life prevails in its pace and
ambitions, in its practicalities and conveniences, but not in steel and height.
And so the other surfaces of
the day become layers of experience. The cheeses at the market, pungent and
legendary (when did France begin its epic climb towards its 450+ kinds of
cheese that DeGaulle presented as the most logical way to explain the
unruliness of the country he was trying to restore to order?); the meats and
fish and produce all presented and talked over every Wednesday and Saturday in
our neighborhood – these days, the market a mere pantomime of what it will be
once Parisian get back from their August vacations. It was with these that we
began our day, and with these that we ended them (dinner of baguette, cheeses,
terrine de lapin, and tomatoes) – ancient textures, messy.
Marie de Medici started this little garden on
what were then (1616) the marshy banks of the Seine. It was kept up in various
ways and then finished in “Haussmanian” style – rough-hewn steps (of poured
concrete carved to look like wood - !!) that you see here, a waterfall, a pond
(filled with carp to Iris’s delight) and a bridge made of thick branches (of
poured concrete carved to look like thick branches – I never get over that:
it’s all over the Buttes Chaumont, too). It’s at the end of Franklin D.
Roosevelt’s street, right before the Cours de Reine and now known as the Garden
of Nouvelle France: Jacques Cartier (who left from Saint-Mâlo (the Breton
connection!) to claim what is today Canada for France) looks sternly out onto
the Seine from his bust atop a column, seeing a New France in a Modern World,
while hankering for cheese.
August 10 – Not for the Faint of Heart
Those of you who know me
and my love of aspic will want to shudder and turn away. For I have found my
hero! My joy! My egg in aspic!!! Poached,
mind you, then lovingly wrapped in a slice of ham, garnished with a delicate
tomato, and suspended in delicious aspic. The Swiss love to top little finger
sandwiches in aspic (so that the little garnishes are held in place just so),
but this poached egg in aspic was a stratospheric other level. Purchased
yesterday at the market, eaten at lunch, and then reminisced about at today’s
lunch. So, it’s lovely enough to look
at. But then look what happens when you cut into it.
Wondrous! The egg is
so perfectly poached that the yolk still runs richly when cut. A healthy chunk
of baguette can rise to the occasion of sopping things up, and you have one
happy Anne. I may have lost all but one or two readers at this point, but if
you’re with me, isn’t this marvelous? The care and craft of suspending a poached
egg in aspic is not lost on me. It is revered and admired, its brilliance and
delight proclaimed.
I was with you - I really was - unit we came to the aspic. A poached egg is wondrous, I agree, but why oh why would one ever want to encase it in such gelatinous horridness?
ReplyDeleteAlas! I fear that I will always be alone in my love and admiration of aspic - a voice in the wilderness of gelatinous wonder (although granted, sound probably doesn't carry far in aspic). Le sigh. I really do love the stuff. :-)
ReplyDelete